A consumer has filed a lawsuit alleging that Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.
falsely advertised its food as free of genetically modified organisms
(GMOs) despite serving meat products from animals fed GMOs and
soft drinks that contain GMO corn syrup. Pappas v. Chipotle Mexican
Grill, Inc., No. 16-0612 (S.D. Cal., filed March 10, 2016). The plaintiff
alleges violations of California’s consumer-protection law and seeks class
certification, damages, an injunction, and attorney’s fees.

The complaint echoes the arguments in a similar California case
dismissed without prejudice in February 2016 finding that the plaintiff’s
definition of GMO was inconsistent. The plaintiff has filed an amended
complaint arguing that consumers “reasonably understand today that
such claims would mean that Chipotle’s menu is 100% free of GMOs and
that Chipotle does not serve food sourced from animals that have been
raised on GMOs or genetically engineered food.” Gallagher v. Chipotle
Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 15-3952 (N.D. Cal., amended complaint filed
March 11, 2016). The plaintiff further argues that consumer organizations
such as the Non-GMO Project and government authorities have aided in
educating the public to associate “Non-GMO” with this cited definition.
Additional information about the initial complaint appears in Issue 577
of this Update, and details about the dismissal appear in Issue 595.

About The Author

For decades, manufacturers, distributors and retailers at every link in the food chain have come to Shook, Hardy & Bacon to partner with a legal team that understands the issues they face in today's evolving food production industry. Shook attorneys work with some of the world's largest food, beverage and agribusiness companies to establish preventative measures, conduct internal audits, develop public relations strategies, and advance tort reform initiatives.

Close